Blog Archives

The Fugitive Kind (1960)

A drifter stands before a judge in a small courtroom in New Orleans.  He tries to explain why, after being hired to entertain at a local party, he suddenly went wild and started raising hell.  It seems he felt so disgusted with himself that he couldn’t keep from tearing the place up.  He just couldn’t stand the life he was living any more.  The judge asks the drifter what he’ll do if he goes free.  The drifter says he’ll leave town and never come back again.

This is the opening scene of The Fugitive Kind, based on the play Orpheus Descending by Tennessee Williams, which debuted on Broadway in 1957.  To give you an idea of how involved Williams was with the subject matter, that play had actually evolved from an earlier version called Battle of Angels, which he’d written in 1940.  And the issues he deals with in The Fugitive Kind are variations on the themes he explored throughout his life.  Innocence and corruption.  Beauty and poetry.  Desire and death. 

Williams is riffing on the myth of Orpheus, which tells the story of a musician whose wife, Eurydice, dies.  He’s so stricken with grief, he goes to the Underworld to find her and plays his lyre for Hades, the god of the dead.  The music is so beautiful that Hades allows Eurydice to leave the Underworld, on the condition that Orpheus not look at her until they reach the world of the living.  The two start on their journey, but Orpheus fails to heed Hades’ warning, turns back to look at his wife, and she’s lost to him forever. 

There are actually several different versions of the myth, and Williams takes considerable license in updating it to reflect his own times and his own temperament.  In The Fugitive Kind, Valentine Xavier is a drifter who wants to make a break with his past.  He’s tired of his life and tired of the crowd he’s been running with.  Val is a loner, an outsider.  He refers to his guitar as his life’s companion.  On the stormy night Val leaves New Orleans, he makes it to a small Southern town where his car breaks down.  Trying to escape the pouring rain, Val seeks refuge at the local jail, where the sheriff’s wife lets him inside.  The sheriff is out chasing a prisoner who has just escaped.  As the two of them talk, the clamor of barking dogs is heard close by.  Then gunshots ring out.  Val knows the manhunt is over.  While this town may be new to him, he knows these places well.  Small Southern hamlets where intolerance and violence are the rule. 

But Val is stranded.  He needs a job.  He ends up finding work at the local general store, run by Lady Torrance.  Her husband, Jabe, is the owner, but he’s so ill he can barely get out of bed.  In spite of his weakened state, he uses what energy he has to dominate and humiliate his wife.  He’s a bitter, angry man, and he’s certain that his wife is interested in the good-looking young drifter she’s hired to work at the store.

Anna Magnani and Marlon Brando

Which, of course, is true.  It’s not long before Val and Lady find they’re drawn to each other.  These are two lonely people, holding a lot of pain inside.  In one scene Lady remembers the days when she was young and her family had parties in the wine garden built by her father.  Those days came to an end when an angry mob burned it to the ground.  The reason?  Her father sold some alcohol to black men.  The pain she feels from that loss is still very much with her, compounded by the pain of her loveless marriage to Jabe.

And Lady isn’t the only one interested in the newcomer.  Carol Cutrere comes from a prominent local family.  She used to be a starry-eyed idealist, but now she’s a rowdy drunk, driving around in her beat up car and raising hell.  She’s suffering, too, but she doesn’t try to hide it.  In fact, she does everything she can to rub her anger in the faces of the straightlaced locals.

Williams may have fared better than many writers when it came to film adaptations of his work.  While it has its flaws, over all The Fugitive Kind is a beautiful and heart-rending film.  The director, Sidney Lumet, was wildly erratic as a filmmaker.  A fast worker, in the course of his career he made almost 40 features, and his filmography lists dozens of TV credits.  Some of his work is so thin and forgettable you get the feeling he was just looking for a paycheck.  But when he found a script he could really commit to (like Dog Day Afternoon or Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead) his work has a compelling immediacy and intensity.  Lumet could be heavy-handed, and there are times when that tendency shows itself here, especially in the portrayal of Jabe.  But he also seems to have had a special feeling for the broken, lonely people who can’t find their place in the world, which is what this film is about.

Lumet seems to have had a close relationship with cinematographer Boris Kaufman.  They worked together on seven films.  This was their third collaboration.  Honestly, I can’t think of anyone better suited to this project than Kaufman.  In addition to his enormous technical skill, he’s also a poet, and he gives us a number of images that echo the poetry in Williams’ lines.  With carefully layered lighting he creates a sense of space in every scene.  The jail, the store, the roadhouse, all feel real, but over all the film has an ethereal, ghostly quality.  This is especially true of the scene where Carol drives Val out to the cemetery at night.  As they talk their voices seem to fall into a vast silence.  Carol tells Val that she can hear the dead, that they’re talking all the time, but they can only say one word.  “Live.”

This is a quiet, melancholy film, and Lumet uses music sparingly.  The understated score by Kenyon Hopkins is one of the composer’s best.  As the opening credits are shown, Hopkins starts off with nothing more than a flute playing a simple motif, joined by broken chords on a guitar, as we gaze down a lonely road.  While there are times where the composer brings in a larger orchestra, for the most part he keeps things low-key.  The music reflects the deep sadness that haunts these people, but it also echoes their hopes. 

To say that Anne Magnani is a powerful presence isn’t saying nearly enough.  At times the emotions she’s expressing are so intense that it can difficult to watch her.  She makes you feel Lady’s pain.  This is a woman who is bitterly disappointed in the life she’s been handed, but she still holds on to a spark of hope that love could change her world.  Though she’s worked hard to bury her emotions, you get the feeling that they’re always just beneath the surface, ready to erupt.  When she does let go, the anger and pain is scorching.  In a different way, Marlon Brando is just as powerful.  Like Lady, Val is lonely.  In spite of his surface cool, he really wants to connect with someone.  He doesn’t really know where he’s going or what he’s doing, but he’s trying to build some kind of a life.  Brando’s approach is understated, but he lets us see Val’s confusion, his loneliness, his longing.

While the tone of the film is mostly subdued, there’s a powerful undercurrent of violence running through it.  This small town holds a lot of hate.  Outsiders and outcasts are not welcome.  If they fail to understand how unwelcome they are, there are frequent reminders laced with bloody threats.  It’s no surprise that the film’s violent climax ends in death.  But since this is Tennessee Williams, it’s also no surprise that beauty survives.  As Carol muses at the end of the film, those outsiders leave tokens behind them, “…so that the fugitive kind can follow their kind.”  We all die.  Poetry lives on.

Baby Doll (1956)

Carroll Baker and Eli Wallach

Carroll Baker and Eli Wallach

Tennessee Williams didn’t just write about sex, he celebrated it. At a time when American culture was still pretty straightlaced, he put eroticism front and center in his work. Some people thought his plays were scandalous, and actually, many of them were. Joyously scandalous. Williams had an amazing gift for combining lurid melodrama with heartbreaking poetry. His racy themes made him a target for criticism, but they also helped push him into the spotlight. The upshot was that he became one of the people who transformed American culture in the fifties.

But like so many people who lead the charge, Williams did run into a few brick walls. He was able to get away with pretty much anything when he was writing for Broadway. Not so much when his plays went to Hollywood. Even though the production code’s influence was waning, the studios still censored themselves. It must have been tough for Williams to see his work mangled. But it may have been even more painful for the writer to see the one film he wrote in complete freedom taken out of circulation and buried.

Baby Doll wasn’t an adaptation. Williams wrote it himself for the screen. It’s about a nineteen year old girl who’s married to a man twice her age. But there’s a catch. The marriage won’t be consummated until she turns twenty. Her husband Archie Lee, a lecherous Southern businessman who runs a cotton gin, can’t wait for her birthday, which is just two days away when the story begins. But Baby Doll isn’t so sure she wants to seal the deal. Archie’s business has run into trouble, and the life of luxury he promised hasn’t materialized. The mansion they live in is a decaying wreck. And to make matters worse, the furniture’s about to be repossessed. This is not the life of ease that Baby Doll expected.

There was probably no one better suited to bring Williams’ vision to the screen than Elia Kazan. He knew how to kindle the energy and intensity the playwright’s work required, and he understood William’s wicked sense of humor. Kazan’s film of A Streetcar Named Desire brought out all the play’s emotional violence against the background of a sultry, expressionist New Orleans. But Baby Doll is a comedy, and so Kazan creates a softer mood. Shot on location, the film has an easy, rambling rhythm that seems to grow naturally out of its setting in the rural South.

Sundown in the South.

Sundown in the South.

Cinematographer Boris Kaufman seems to feel the landscape as much as he sees it. The sun’s fading rays scattered across a withered field. The flat, harsh lighting of a small town cafe. The wistful sadness of a rainy day. He seamlessly melds the weathered landscapes of the South and the crumbling grandeur of the old mansion into the same visual fabric. Kaufman had a gift for finding a film’s emotional tone. The film is a comedy, but the images also reveal the pathos in the struggles of these small town folks. Kenyon Hopkin’s sensual score also plays an important part. The strings glide along with a silky indolence, while the insinuating sax has a sensual, lazy warmth.

You can’t talk about this film without talking about the actors. Williams’ script gives them a lot to work with, and they all wring everything they can out of their parts. Karl Malden’s Archie Lee is an ignorant bully, but there are times when you can’t help feeling sorry for him. He’s so dumb he has no idea why his life is so miserable. Eli Wallach is brimming with vitality as Vacarro, the Sicilian immigrant who’s made a success of himself even though the townspeople hate him. Vacarro may be ruthless, but he’s not cruel, and Wallach let’s us see a glimmer of compassion under his hard surface. And at the center of it all is Carroll Baker’s Baby Doll, a child who doesn’t realize she’s become a woman. The actress plays the role with a bracing mix of innocence and carnality. As physical as her performance is, she also handles Williams’ dialogue beautifully. She brings a heartbreaking sweetness to the film’s melancholy final line.

Eli Wallach, Karl Malden and Carroll Baker

Eli Wallach, Karl Malden and Carroll Baker

Baby Doll is a lively, entertaining and beautiful film. But it came out in the mid-fifties, and the world just wasn’t ready for it. The Catholic Church denounced it as pornographic. The Legion of Decency and other groups came out against it. After a brief release, Warner Bros. pulled it out of theatres. Williams was bitterly disappointed. The film had its defenders, but a few glowing reviews weren’t enough to counteract the storm of criticism. Baby Doll went back into the vaults, and sat there for decades. In spite of the amazing number of talented people who worked on this movie, it was pretty much forgotten for forty years.

Film is a funny business. There are so many artists who go to Hollywood and get completely beaten down. The movies they try to make get mangled, and sometimes even buried. But Baby Doll is back in circulation again, and it’s proof that sometimes the artists win out. Williams had a great sense of humor. I can almost hear him laughing from the grave.